HI
Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. (HG)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered $80.9M net income ($0.77 diluted EPS), despite heavy catastrophe activity; total revenues were $768.8M and the combined ratio rose to 111.6% on California wildfire losses .
- Gross premiums written grew 16.8% YoY to $843.3M; net premiums earned rose 29.5% YoY to $498.9M, reflecting strong underlying growth across International and Bermuda segments .
- Investment results were a significant offset: total investment return of $167.3M, including $103.6M from Two Sigma Hamilton Fund (5.5% net return) and $63.8M from fixed income, short-term and cash .
- Street expected a slight EPS loss in Q1; actual EPS was a large beat versus consensus (-$0.05 EPS est.; $0.77 actual). Revenues also exceeded consensus ($498M est. vs $768.8M actual). Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Management reiterated double-digit top-line growth opportunities, highlighted casualty momentum from the A.M. Best upgrade (~$40M Q1 uplift; ~$80M expected in 2025), and continued buybacks below book value ($10.3M in Q1) as capital deployment catalysts .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Double-digit premium momentum: GPW +16.8% YoY to $843.3M, NPE +29.5% YoY to $498.9M, driven by growth in property, casualty and specialty lines across both segments .
- Investment outperformance: $167.3M total investment return; TSHF contributed $103.6M (5.5% net), fixed income/short-term/cash $63.8M, more than offsetting underwriting losses .
- Attritional loss improvement: current-year attritional loss ratio fell 5.3 points YoY to 51.9% as large losses seen in Q1 2024 (Baltimore Bridge) did not recur . CEO: “Hamilton is off to a strong start with $81 million of net income... despite industry insured catastrophe losses well above the historical average” .
What Went Wrong
- Catastrophe impact: Combined ratio spiked to 111.6% on wildfire-related cat losses; California wildfire losses were $142.8M net plus $16.9M reinstatement premiums; Bermuda’s combined ratio hit 122.8% with a $59.1M underwriting loss .
- Acquisition cost ratio increased 1.5 points YoY to 23.4% on business mix and higher profit commissions; International’s acquisition ratio +1.9 points; Bermuda’s +1.4 points .
- Underwriting loss: Group underwriting income was -$58.3M vs +$32.5M in Q1 2024, reflecting the cat headwind .
Financial Results
- Consensus vs Actual (Q1 2025): EPS est. -$0.05 vs actual $0.77; Revenue est. $498.0M vs actual $768.8M; EBITDA actual $196.9M*. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Breakdown (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024)
Key Ratios (Group)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO framing: “Gross premiums written up 17%... attritional loss ratio was 51.9%... Investment results were significant, with a total investment return of $167 million” .
- Segment strategy: International growth from U.S. E&S; specialty expansion in PA, fine art & species, marine; Hamilton Select up 51% in Q1 .
- Reinsurance outlook: “Loss-affected accounts will see rate increases... increased demand and stable supply” into midyear .
- Casualty positioning: “We continue to lean in, albeit in a highly selective and disciplined manner... focus on clients with strong underwriting and claims handling culture” .
Q&A Highlights
- Casualty growth drivers: AM Best upgrade unlocked business; low-to-mid-teens pricing; selective client targeting; ~$40M casualty premium uplift in Q1 .
- Attritional loss ratio mix: Higher picks tied to more casualty/pro rata; 2024 full-year ratios are the best guide for run-rate .
- Reinstatement premiums: Quantified at $17M net in Q1 across insurance/reinsurance .
- Expense ratio: Acquisition up on mix and profit commissions (e.g., property binders, quota share); other underwriting expenses declining with scale .
- Buybacks: $10M used in Q1; short window due to timing; will extend as accelerated filer; ample capital for growth and returns .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025: Primary EPS consensus -$0.0488 vs actual $0.77 (large beat); Revenue consensus $498.0M vs actual $768.8M (beat); EBITDA actual $196.9M*. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Q4 2024: EPS consensus $0.544 vs actual $0.32 (miss)*. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Q3 2024: EPS consensus $0.714 vs actual $0.74 (slight beat)*. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Target Price Consensus Mean: $28.5 (unchanged across periods)*. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Catastrophes drove an underwriting loss but strong investment income protected GAAP results; monitor cat exposure concentration (Bermuda) and wildfire seasonality .
- Casualty remains a growth engine post-AM Best upgrade; social inflation assumptions embedded—expect higher attritional picks when mix tilts to casualty .
- Midyear renewals: anticipate rate increases on loss-affected property-cat programs; overall supply/demand stable—supportive for pricing into H2 .
- Capital deployment: continued below-book buybacks alongside double-digit premium growth; BVPS up 2.8% QoQ to $23.59 .
- International portfolio resilience: combined ~100% despite catastrophes; diversified specialty and Lloyd’s platform underpin lower volatility .
- Watch acquisition cost ratio: mix (quota shares, binders) and profit commissions can elevate acquisition costs; scaling should continue to reduce other underwriting expenses .
- Near-term trading: EPS and revenue beats vs consensus support sentiment; headline combined ratio weakness is cat-driven, with investment returns offset—expect stock sensitivity to midyear pricing outcomes and further casualty growth clarity .
Citations: Press release and supplementary financial information .